Realism and Pragmatism
In a fascinating interview broadcast yesterday, former Secretary of State, former Secretary of the Treasury, and former White House Chief of Staff James Baker [pictured above with President Reagan in 1988] believes realism and pragmatism are central to an effective foreign policy. They are also concepts Baker said he is happy to see the United States return to in President Barack Obama's foreign policy. This is in stark contrast to GOP leader Newt Gingrich's view that Obama has a Fantasy Foreign Policy. Catch the clip here at Conservatism with Heart. Let's see now. If I had to choose between Gingrich, who served as a congressman, and who never had to be responsible for negotiating with and dealing with foreign leaders, and James Baker, who served under both Ronald Reagan and the first President Bush, I think I would choose the expertise of Mr. Baker. Mr. Baker was very supportive of President Obama's approach to both Russia and the Middle East [including Iran and Iraq] in this interview. But maybe you are not the type that gets excited about foreign policy. Perhaps you would be interested in Mr. Baker's views on the economy. He mentioned that when he was on the job, the US hit a pretty rough patch and the government "threw liquidity at the problem," just like Geithner is doing. He mentioned that while our current Secretary has had some rough spots, he said "a lot of what has been done by the Fed and Treasury has been absolutely the right thing to do." He also said that we ought to support our Treasury Secretary and that he, in fact does and hopes he succeeds. Lest you think Baker is some kind of RINO [for those of you not versed in Republican party lingo, that means Republican in Name Only, as in John McCain], let's remember that it was Baker who organized the team that put GW Bush into the White House after the Florida mess. He also stated that he believes our country is much better off having had Bush, as opposed to Gore. My point here is that those on the right who are apoplectic about President Obama's monetary and foreign policy ought to step back and take a deep breath. There are principled Republicans out there who know what is going on in the world and who believe in President Barack Obama's policies. Maybe they know something we don't. Here's the entire interview. |
Comments on "Realism and Pragmatism"
Dave,
It did not take me too long after first starting to blog that most of what passes for conservatism on the internet is just ANTI something or another.
I watched the Baker interview....
It was sane; which sure beats the insanity of most of what you read on the internet.
That's a good word TAO, Sane.
Just quiet, intelligent, and reasonable discussion.
Devoid of yelling, name calling, blustering, etc.
It was a real joy to watch.
Sanity seems to be lacking in the GOP these days.
Especially the GWB apologists. I can't even wrap my mind around those that still hold him up as some sort of "conservative."
What happened to the GOP?
Maybe Newt was right the other day when he said that a third party could very well be in the elections of 2012, or at least 2016.
It would be nice.
*Shameless plug* I just wrote about more of GWB's legacy that is coming to light.
Plug away James. Maybe both of the people who read me will look you up!
I saw that interview with Newt. He has always been a man of ideas.
I would like to see another party in some of the upcoming elections because I believe it might push the candidates to show some real differences.
Dave, I believe more than two people read you! I keep seeing your blog on people's blogrolls.